header-logo header-logo

06 September 2024 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 8084 / Categories: Features , Employment , Tribunals , TUPE
printer mail-detail

TUPE revisited in the Employment Appeal Tribunal

188096
Nicholas Dobson examines a recent EAT case, involving an NHS Integrated Care Board, in which TUPE made an appearance
  • Discusses Bicknell and another v NHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Integrated Commissioning Board [2024] EAT 103.
  • Shows how commissioning is not an economic activity for the purposes of TUPE, where the commissioner does not provide the goods or services on the market itself.

The Transfer of Undertaking (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246) (TUPE) was once ‘box office’. It was all over the legal press. There were conferences, government working parties and books on it. And if TUPE were a crime, I’d be guilty of all three. But in recent years, like a faded film or rock icon, TUPE’s star has faded, and it’s generally been able to get on quietly with its life. But on 25 June 2024, TUPE did make an appearance in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) before Sheldon J in Bicknell and another v NHS Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Integrated Commissioning Board [2024] EAT

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll