header-logo header-logo

13 November 2008
Issue: 7345 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

An uncertain art

Who should bear the risk of market volatility? Ian Gascoigne reports

“Always expect the unexpected.” Perhaps this is a good lesson for life, especially in these turbulent times in the financial world, but it is not something a contract breaker is required to do. He is required only to expect what it is reasonable to anticipate will happen as a consequence of his failure to perform his agreement. He does not have to engage in speculation about something which could happen if it is not likely to do so. Therefore, a victim of contract breach may suffer losses which he cannot recover because their occurrence cannot be said to be probable from the outset.

Without any variation in a particular contract, this principle requires a party in breach to pay the bill arising from the consequences of what the parties reasonably contemplated as the probable result of breach, at the time they made their agreement. The ambit is to be assessed either objectively, or as a result of special circumstances which are known to both parties when

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll