header-logo header-logo

28 February 2025 / John Gould
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Opinion , Rule of law , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail

The Attorney General: under attack?

209438
Condemning an Attorney General based on their past client list shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the rule of law, writes John Gould

An exchange between Sir Ashley Fox and the Attorney General (AG), Lord Hermer, at the Commons Justice Select Committee in January seems to have been the start of a period of remorseless newspaper speculation as to how Lord Hermer might be misconducting himself by having unsound beliefs or perhaps by ignoring ‘conflicts of interest’. Sir Ashley had spotted that the AG had previously represented former Sinn Féin president Gerry Adams in defending a claim for damages by provisional IRA bomb victims. This, and other cases, might be presented to the uninformed as something which made a lawyer unfit to hold the office of AG. In fact, the opposite is true.

A link was suggested to the government’s recent confirmation that it would be changing the law in a way which might benefit a class of people which possibly included Mr Adams. The decision followed a specific finding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll