header-logo header-logo

The Attorney General: under attack?

28 February 2025 / John Gould
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Opinion , Rule of law , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail
209438
Condemning an Attorney General based on their past client list shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the rule of law, writes John Gould

An exchange between Sir Ashley Fox and the Attorney General (AG), Lord Hermer, at the Commons Justice Select Committee in January seems to have been the start of a period of remorseless newspaper speculation as to how Lord Hermer might be misconducting himself by having unsound beliefs or perhaps by ignoring ‘conflicts of interest’. Sir Ashley had spotted that the AG had previously represented former Sinn Féin president Gerry Adams in defending a claim for damages by provisional IRA bomb victims. This, and other cases, might be presented to the uninformed as something which made a lawyer unfit to hold the office of AG. In fact, the opposite is true.

A link was suggested to the government’s recent confirmation that it would be changing the law in a way which might benefit a class of people which possibly included Mr Adams. The decision followed a specific finding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

Charity strengthens leadership as national Pro Bono Week takes place

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Dual-qualified partner joins London disputes practice

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

Transactions practice welcomes partner in London office

NEWS
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll