header-logo header-logo

04 August 2011 / Andrew P Willetts
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Features , Damages , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Under contract?

Andrew P Willetts takes a contractual drive from the Jowett Javelin to Formula 1

In contract law the total failure of consideration by one contracting party to another has always been considered prima facie evidence to entitle the aggrieved party the right to rescind. The rescinding party can then recover all monies paid under the agreement notwithstanding that in the interim substantial benefit had been received by them. A total failure of consideration can only usually occur when there is a breach of a condition going to the heart of the bargain. This can include a seller not actually having title for the goods he is purporting to sell or as in the case of Giedo Van Der Garde BV and another v Force India Formula One team Ltd [2010] EWHC 2373 (QB), [2010] All ER (D) 122 (Sep), the failure of a Formula 1 racing team to provide a driver the contracted mileage for showcasing his driving skills. Although in Giedo the High Court rejected a claim for restitution for fact specific reasons,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
back-to-top-scroll