header-logo header-logo

04 August 2011 / Andrew P Willetts
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Features , Damages , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Under contract?

Andrew P Willetts takes a contractual drive from the Jowett Javelin to Formula 1

In contract law the total failure of consideration by one contracting party to another has always been considered prima facie evidence to entitle the aggrieved party the right to rescind. The rescinding party can then recover all monies paid under the agreement notwithstanding that in the interim substantial benefit had been received by them. A total failure of consideration can only usually occur when there is a breach of a condition going to the heart of the bargain. This can include a seller not actually having title for the goods he is purporting to sell or as in the case of Giedo Van Der Garde BV and another v Force India Formula One team Ltd [2010] EWHC 2373 (QB), [2010] All ER (D) 122 (Sep), the failure of a Formula 1 racing team to provide a driver the contracted mileage for showcasing his driving skills. Although in Giedo the High Court rejected a claim for restitution for fact specific reasons,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll