header-logo header-logo

12 July 2007
Issue: 7281 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

UNDER ORDERS

In brief

The government has mounted a legal battle in the House of Lords to protect control orders. The law lords have been asked to consider the legality of the orders, which were introduced under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 and allow a suspect’s freedom to be curtailed although they have not been charged or tried in open court. Seven of the 17 suspects on control orders have absconded and Liberty has called the control order scheme “unsafe” and “unfair”. It suggests instead allowing the use of intercept evidence in the criminal courts and allowing post-charge questioning.

Issue: 7281 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—David Smith

Freeths—David Smith

Freeths secures major tax hire with appointment of David Smith

Ellisons—Chris Burnett

Ellisons—Chris Burnett

Patent attorney joins Ellisons to strengthen intellectual property offering

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten strengthens financial markets and funds group in London

NEWS
The Court of Appeal's decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP has lifted months of uncertainty for Chartered Legal Executives while prompting a rethink of regulation and supervision
The assisted dying debate returns to Westminster as Lauren Edwards MP reintroduces legislation that stalled in the House of Lords last session despite clearing the Commons
A little-noticed provision of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 has fundamentally expanded corporate criminal liability
Artificial intelligence is transforming legal practice, but careless reliance on it is creating growing professional risks
The law offers cohabiting couples surprisingly greater protection after one partner dies than when they separate during life
back-to-top-scroll