header-logo header-logo

UNDER ORDERS

12 July 2007
Issue: 7281 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

In brief

The government has mounted a legal battle in the House of Lords to protect control orders. The law lords have been asked to consider the legality of the orders, which were introduced under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 and allow a suspect’s freedom to be curtailed although they have not been charged or tried in open court. Seven of the 17 suspects on control orders have absconded and Liberty has called the control order scheme “unsafe” and “unfair”. It suggests instead allowing the use of intercept evidence in the criminal courts and allowing post-charge questioning.

Issue: 7281 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Human rights lawyers, social justice champion, co-founder of the law firm Bindmans, and NLJ columnist Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC has died at the age of 92 years
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
back-to-top-scroll