header-logo header-logo

17 February 2021 / David Renton
Issue: 7921 / Categories: Opinion , Housing , Covid-19 , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Housing law reform: Under pressure

39775
David Renton reports on the current status of the evictions ban & the growing pressure on government to act on its promises of housing law reform

Before 21 February 2021, the government will need to decide whether or not to extend the current ban on tenant evictions.

Contained in the Public Health (Coronavirus) (Protection from Eviction) (England) Regulations 2021 (SI 2021/15) the ban currently prohibits bailiffs from delivering a notice of eviction or executing a warrant of possession, save where certain exceptions apply: if the underlying possession was granted against trespassers, or was granted on grounds of anti-social behaviour, or the case involved arrears equivalent to six months’ or more rent.

Introduced during the second lockdown in November 2020, the present eviction ban is narrower than the original eviction ban made in March 2020, which did not merely limit bailiff attendance but also prohibited possession and eviction hearings.

Such hearings began again in the autumn and have continued through the present lockdown. The result is that a bottleneck

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll