header-logo header-logo

17 February 2021 / David Renton
Issue: 7921 / Categories: Opinion , Housing , Covid-19 , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Housing law reform: Under pressure

39775
David Renton reports on the current status of the evictions ban & the growing pressure on government to act on its promises of housing law reform

Before 21 February 2021, the government will need to decide whether or not to extend the current ban on tenant evictions.

Contained in the Public Health (Coronavirus) (Protection from Eviction) (England) Regulations 2021 (SI 2021/15) the ban currently prohibits bailiffs from delivering a notice of eviction or executing a warrant of possession, save where certain exceptions apply: if the underlying possession was granted against trespassers, or was granted on grounds of anti-social behaviour, or the case involved arrears equivalent to six months’ or more rent.

Introduced during the second lockdown in November 2020, the present eviction ban is narrower than the original eviction ban made in March 2020, which did not merely limit bailiff attendance but also prohibited possession and eviction hearings.

Such hearings began again in the autumn and have continued through the present lockdown. The result is that a bottleneck

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll