header-logo header-logo

Under surveillance—who’s watching & why?

26 February 2020 / Beth Bell
Issue: 7876 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
16645
Beth Bell considers the lawfulness & usefulness of covert recordings in family cases
  • The lawfulness of the recording: can a recording be relied on in court?
  • Will the evidence advance the client’s case?

The issue of obtaining information in a clandestine fashion is not a new one for family law practitioners. It has long been the practice of those experiencing the fall-out from relationship breakdown to access confidential information belonging to their ex, typically in relation to their financial affairs. In this context the law in relation to the historic practices that grew up around the so-called Hildebrand rules have been clarified, most notably in Tchenguiz and others v Imerman [2010] EWCA Civ 908, [2011] 1 All ER 555. A more recent feature of family disputes, and an issue which judges and practitioners are having to grapple with on an increasingly frequent basis, is information obtained by way of covert recording.

This issue is not unique to the family law arena and is being encountered by judges in a variety

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll