header-logo header-logo

Unexplained Wealth Orders. Explained

09 March 2018 / David Bloom
Issue: 7784 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
nlj_7784_bloom

David Bloom considers UWOs—the newest enforcement measure introduced to tackle money laundering & economic crime

  • Conditions for issuing an order.
  • Consequences of non-compliance

Since 31st January 2018, the enforcement authorities in England and Wales have been empowered with a new investigative tool to tackle money laundering and economic crime: Unexplained Wealth Orders (UWOs). These widely-trailed measures have been billed as having the potential to redefine the asset recovery regime. However, scrutiny of the statutory framework suggests limitations and challenges in practice indicative of more modest reforms.

Background

Introduced by the Criminal Finances Act 2017, which amended the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002), the aim behind UWOs was set out in the legislation’s Explanatory Notes: to fill the lacuna in the POCA 2002 provisions that often meant enforcement authorities were unable to freeze or recover assets, even when they had reasonable grounds to suspect the identified assets represented the proceeds of crime, due to their inability to obtain evidence —often from overseas jurisdictions.

UWOs do not confer a new power to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll