header-logo header-logo

06 November 2008
Issue: 7344 / Categories: Opinion , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Unfair selection?

Helen Gill questions why the Equality Act exempts faith schools from its provisions

The decision in R(E) v JFS [2008] EWHC 1665 (Admin) has been championed as clarifying the meaning of race discrimination under the Race Relations Act 1977 (RRA 1976). However, would it be better regarded as a stark illustration of the limits of developing equality jurisprudence?

JFS is a school whose admissions policy prioritises children who are recognised as Jewish by the Office of the Chief Rabbi (OCR) of the United Congregation of the Commonwealth. E’s son, M, was denied admission to the school because M’s mother’s conversion to Orthodox Judaism was undertaken by an “independent progressive synagogue” rather than by a category of synagogue approved of by the OCR.

M was unable to attend the school, although he “is recognised as Jewish by the Reform synagogues of Great Britain and the Assembly of Masorti synagogues, practises his own Jewish faith, prays in Hebrew and attends synagogue and a Jewish youth group”. An atheist child of an atheist family (or a child whose family practised

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll