header-logo header-logo

Unfair selection?

06 November 2008
Issue: 7344 / Categories: Opinion , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Helen Gill questions why the Equality Act exempts faith schools from its provisions

The decision in R(E) v JFS [2008] EWHC 1665 (Admin) has been championed as clarifying the meaning of race discrimination under the Race Relations Act 1977 (RRA 1976). However, would it be better regarded as a stark illustration of the limits of developing equality jurisprudence?

JFS is a school whose admissions policy prioritises children who are recognised as Jewish by the Office of the Chief Rabbi (OCR) of the United Congregation of the Commonwealth. E’s son, M, was denied admission to the school because M’s mother’s conversion to Orthodox Judaism was undertaken by an “independent progressive synagogue” rather than by a category of synagogue approved of by the OCR.

M was unable to attend the school, although he “is recognised as Jewish by the Reform synagogues of Great Britain and the Assembly of Masorti synagogues, practises his own Jewish faith, prays in Hebrew and attends synagogue and a Jewish youth group”. An atheist child of an atheist family (or a child whose family practised

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll