header-logo header-logo

29 January 2014 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7592 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , CPR
printer mail-detail

Unfinished business

web_regan_1

Dominic Regan predicts the likely civil procedure developments for 2014

It is not over. While the core elements of the Jackson reforms were indeed implemented in April 2013, with portal extensions arriving at the end of July, there remains unfinished business. What follows is an informed analysis of likely developments. This is not random guesswork but is derived from a series of understandably discreet conversations with judges and law makers.

The B word

Budgeting was declared by Sir Rupert to be central to his reforms, introducing an obligation to reveal work to be done and costs to be incurred in multi-track actions commenced from 1 April. One concern is that the process can be evaded. The Commercial Court enjoys a cosy blanket exemption as indeed does Admiralty. Cases worth over £2m running in Chancery and the TCC are also excluded. The Senior Master made a perfectly sound point when he said that cases worth surely warranted budgeting more than lesser valued claims. A

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll