header-logo header-logo

16 March 2018 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7785 / Categories: Opinion , Tribunals , Legal aid focus , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

The Unison effect

nlj_7785_hynes

Steve Hynes discusses the root causes of a big rise in employment tribunal cases

Rises of up to 90% have been reported by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) in their latest statistics on employment tribunal (ET) cases released on 8 March. The trend of an increase in claims has become established over the last six months since the successful challenge, brought by the trade union Unison, to the introduction of the ET fee scheme.

From 29 July 2013 two levels of fees were introduced for ETs. For type A claims involving cases such as non-payment of wages, a fee of £160 was payable to issue proceedings. A charge of £250 was made for type B cases which included discrimination and unfair dismissal claims. With the hearing fee the total cost for a type A would be £390 and £1200 for a type B case. The impact of the fees was immediate as the number of cases being brought plummeted by around 70%.

After the success of Unison’s case before the Supreme Court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll