header-logo header-logo

16 March 2018 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7785 / Categories: Opinion , Tribunals , Legal aid focus , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

The Unison effect

nlj_7785_hynes

Steve Hynes discusses the root causes of a big rise in employment tribunal cases

Rises of up to 90% have been reported by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) in their latest statistics on employment tribunal (ET) cases released on 8 March. The trend of an increase in claims has become established over the last six months since the successful challenge, brought by the trade union Unison, to the introduction of the ET fee scheme.

From 29 July 2013 two levels of fees were introduced for ETs. For type A claims involving cases such as non-payment of wages, a fee of £160 was payable to issue proceedings. A charge of £250 was made for type B cases which included discrimination and unfair dismissal claims. With the hearing fee the total cost for a type A would be £390 and £1200 for a type B case. The impact of the fees was immediate as the number of cases being brought plummeted by around 70%.

After the success of Unison’s case before the Supreme Court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll