header-logo header-logo

12 June 2008 / Jolyon Patten
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Features , Public , Insurance / reinsurance , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Unlawful conduct

Jolyon Patten explains why local authorities cannot act as insurers

In a landmark two-part judgment (Risk Management Partners Ltd v Brent London Borough Council and others [2008] All ER (D) 226 (May)) which will have far-reaching implications for the insurance industry and for local authorities, the High Court has found that Brent LBC had no power to participate in London Authorities Mutual Limited (LAML), a mutual insurer for London borough councils. It also found, in principle, that no local authority can participate in such a mutual if it does so to save money on its insurance. In additional (obiter) comments, the judge held that there might be circumstances in which a local authority could do so, but that there was no evidence that LAML could bring itself within those circumstances.

A second judgment in the same case addresses for the first time in the UK the so-called Teckal exemption to EU rules on public procurement. Here, it was found that Brent did not have the necessary control over

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll