header-logo header-logo

Unlawful DWP policy denied help to destitute claimants

31 May 2023
Issue: 8027 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail
The government cannot refuse advance payments of universal credit to claimants in financial hardship simply because they don’t have a national insurance number (NINo), the Court of Appeal has held.

Universal credit, which is paid in arrears, is not paid until at least five weeks after making a claim. However, the secretary of state may make advance payments where there is financial need and where it looks likely the conditions of benefit will be satisfied. Where a person does not have a NINo, however, no advance payments are made until the claimant’s entitlement to a NINo has been verified by a specialist team.

R (BUI) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; R (Onakoya) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2023] EWCA Civ 566 concerned two individuals who did not have NINos.

The Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) and Central England Law Centre (CELC) successfully argued at appeal that the Department for Work and Pension’s (DWP’s) blanket practice of refusing advance payments without a NINo was unlawful. The court held the legislation did not prevent advance payments to claimants without a NINo.

Michael Bates, head of public law at CELC, said: ‘The transition to mainstream support for those whose immigration status has been recently regularised has been problematic for many years.

‘Delays in allocating NINos and the knock-on delays to benefits payments has left many facing destitution just at the point of increased need. This judgment now means that the DWP will be required to consider putting benefits payments in place almost immediately.

‘It will also remove the need for costly emergency expenditure by local authorities who are often left to pick up the pieces.’

Claire Hall, head of strategic litigation at CPAG, said: ‘This is an important win and must be implemented by the DWP urgently.’

Issue: 8027 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll