header-logo header-logo

31 May 2023
Issue: 8027 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Unlawful DWP policy denied help to destitute claimants

The government cannot refuse advance payments of universal credit to claimants in financial hardship simply because they don’t have a national insurance number (NINo), the Court of Appeal has held.

Universal credit, which is paid in arrears, is not paid until at least five weeks after making a claim. However, the secretary of state may make advance payments where there is financial need and where it looks likely the conditions of benefit will be satisfied. Where a person does not have a NINo, however, no advance payments are made until the claimant’s entitlement to a NINo has been verified by a specialist team.

R (BUI) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; R (Onakoya) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2023] EWCA Civ 566 concerned two individuals who did not have NINos.

The Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) and Central England Law Centre (CELC) successfully argued at appeal that the Department for Work and Pension’s (DWP’s) blanket practice of refusing advance payments without a NINo was unlawful. The court held the legislation did not prevent advance payments to claimants without a NINo.

Michael Bates, head of public law at CELC, said: ‘The transition to mainstream support for those whose immigration status has been recently regularised has been problematic for many years.

‘Delays in allocating NINos and the knock-on delays to benefits payments has left many facing destitution just at the point of increased need. This judgment now means that the DWP will be required to consider putting benefits payments in place almost immediately.

‘It will also remove the need for costly emergency expenditure by local authorities who are often left to pick up the pieces.’

Claire Hall, head of strategic litigation at CPAG, said: ‘This is an important win and must be implemented by the DWP urgently.’

Issue: 8027 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
back-to-top-scroll