header-logo header-logo

Unrated insurer ban proposal dropped

07 May 2014
Issue: 7605 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Controversial SRA plans are shelved

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has pulled the plug on its proposed ban on unrated insurers.

Its proposal—consulted on earlier this year—would have required a minimum B-plus rating for insurers. However, it sparked fears that premiums could rise and thousands of firms could be left without professional indemnity insurance (PII). 

An SRA spokesperson said concerns that certain consumers would be left unprotected had been overridden by the findings of an impact assessment that three insurers could end up unrated, leaving about 2,500 firms uninsured, while new protections due to be brought in by the Financial Conduct Authority before October would reduce the risks.

The decision is part of a wider package of SRA reforms to ease the regulatory burden on smaller firms, announced this week in a policy paper, Approach to Regulation and its Reform. They include reducing the minimum terms and conditions for PII, ending the requirement for annual accountants’ reports, and encouraging more multi-disciplinary ABSs.

 

Issue: 7605 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll