header-logo header-logo

Unravelling the legacy of abuse

16 February 2018 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7781 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
nlj_7781_scorer

Richard Scorer provides an update on the work of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse & considers its future role

  • Is the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse scaling back its investigations or even becoming redundant?

Recent media reports have suggested that the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse (IICSA) is scaling back its investigations into allegations of paedophile rings involving Westminster politicians, and some reports have even suggested that the inquiry is now redundant. So what is happening with IICSA, and where does it go from here? 

IICSA originally started life in 2014 following widespread concern about institutional child abuse, including at Westminster. Its chair, Alexis Jay, exercises judicial powers and its terms of reference are ‘to consider the extent to which state and non-state institutions have failed…to protect children from sexual abuse’ and to identify steps required to prevent such abuse in the future. The range of institutions specified in the terms of reference is extremely wide: police, CPS, schools, care homes, churches and more. The period covered

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll