header-logo header-logo

27 November 2008 / Paola Fudakowska , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Update from the courts

Paul Hewitt & Paola Fudakowska discuss recent cases

In Jones and others v Firkin-Flood and another [2008] EWHC 2417 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 175 (Oct) the deceased (D) made a will in 2001, under which he appointed as executors his solicitor, one of his sons (I), and two employees of the family business and longstanding friends. The assets in his estate were the shares in the family companies and the family home. The main issues before Mr Justice Briggs were the contested distribution of the estate between D’s children and the conduct of the trustees. The judge dismissed the counterclaim by I’s brother and sister that there was an agreement made between them at the time the will was executed that the estate would be divided equally between them.

Trustees’ conduct
In relation to the trustees’ conduct the judge found that the trustees failed to ascertain the nature and extent of their duties and no trust accounts were ever prepared. Additionally, the trustees failed to supervise the management of the trust

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gardner Leader—Charlotte Botham & Belinda Sinnott

Gardner Leader—Charlotte Botham & Belinda Sinnott

Law firm strengthens real estate team with two new partners

DR Solicitors—Sarah Cook

DR Solicitors—Sarah Cook

DR Solicitors strengthens primary care expertise with appointment of legal director

Womble Bond Dickinson—David Varney

Womble Bond Dickinson—David Varney

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints David Varney to strengthen digital practice

NEWS
The law offers cohabiting couples surprisingly greater protection after one partner dies than when they separate during life
Four recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decisions have clarified important employment law principles on dismissal, bonuses, trade union activity and tribunal procedure
The Court of Appeal's decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP has lifted months of uncertainty for Chartered Legal Executives while prompting a rethink of regulation and supervision
The assisted dying debate returns to Westminster as Lauren Edwards MP reintroduces legislation that stalled in the House of Lords last session despite clearing the Commons
A little-noticed provision of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 has fundamentally expanded corporate criminal liability
back-to-top-scroll