header-logo header-logo

27 November 2008 / Paola Fudakowska , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Update from the courts

Paul Hewitt & Paola Fudakowska discuss recent cases

In Jones and others v Firkin-Flood and another [2008] EWHC 2417 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 175 (Oct) the deceased (D) made a will in 2001, under which he appointed as executors his solicitor, one of his sons (I), and two employees of the family business and longstanding friends. The assets in his estate were the shares in the family companies and the family home. The main issues before Mr Justice Briggs were the contested distribution of the estate between D’s children and the conduct of the trustees. The judge dismissed the counterclaim by I’s brother and sister that there was an agreement made between them at the time the will was executed that the estate would be divided equally between them.

Trustees’ conduct
In relation to the trustees’ conduct the judge found that the trustees failed to ascertain the nature and extent of their duties and no trust accounts were ever prepared. Additionally, the trustees failed to supervise the management of the trust

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll