header-logo header-logo

25 January 2013
Issue: 7545 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Value added tax

Re South African Tourist Board [2013] UKFTT 780 (TC), [2013] All ER (D) 52 (Jan)

It was settled law that the test as to whether an activity was a business was whether it had been: (a) a “serious undertaking earnestly pursued”; (b) pursued with reasonable continuity; (c) substantial in amount; (d) conducted regularly on sound and recognised business principles; (e) predominantly concerned with the making of taxable supplies to consumers for a consideration; and (f) such as consisted of taxable supplies of a kind commonly made by those who seek to make profit from them. Further, supplies could be supplies even if they were made without realising profit, or even having the intention of realising a profit. The receipt by a statutory body of funds from the government in order to carry out the purpose for which it had been established could not be an economic activity. There was a very significant distinction between a state outsourcing to an independent third party, which could be profit making, whether or not it actually was, and the state

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll