header-logo header-logo

08 October 2021 / Paul Henty
Issue: 7951 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Vertical agreements: top-to-bottom reform

60016
The EU has outlined new ‘vertical’ rules on distribution: Paul Henty reports
  • The EU Commission’s draft EU Vertical Agreements Block Exemption proposes changes to dual distribution, parity clauses, dual pricing and bans on active selling.
  • Following Brexit, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority is also consulting on a new instrument to replace the existing block exemption.

On 9 July 2021, the EU Commission released a draft version of the EU Vertical Agreements Block Exemption (VABE) for consultation, together with the accompanying vertical agreements guidelines. The proposed changes are significant for businesses.

Vertical agreements are those which relate to the supply of goods and services between parties at different levels of the supply chain.

The most obvious examples may occur in retail (for example, the supplier of luxury fashion items and a chain of high street stores) but the concept goes wider. In the construction context, examples of vertical arrangements would include an agreement between a manufacturer of materials and its wholesaler, or between a supplier of raw materials and a manufacturer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll