header-logo header-logo

Vertical agreements: top-to-bottom reform

08 October 2021 / Paul Henty
Issue: 7951 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Commercial
printer mail-detail
60016
The EU has outlined new ‘vertical’ rules on distribution: Paul Henty reports
  • The EU Commission’s draft EU Vertical Agreements Block Exemption proposes changes to dual distribution, parity clauses, dual pricing and bans on active selling.
  • Following Brexit, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority is also consulting on a new instrument to replace the existing block exemption.

On 9 July 2021, the EU Commission released a draft version of the EU Vertical Agreements Block Exemption (VABE) for consultation, together with the accompanying vertical agreements guidelines. The proposed changes are significant for businesses.

Vertical agreements are those which relate to the supply of goods and services between parties at different levels of the supply chain.

The most obvious examples may occur in retail (for example, the supplier of luxury fashion items and a chain of high street stores) but the concept goes wider. In the construction context, examples of vertical arrangements would include an agreement between a manufacturer of materials and its wholesaler, or between a supplier of raw materials and a manufacturer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll