header-logo header-logo

08 October 2021 / Paul Henty
Issue: 7951 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Vertical agreements: top-to-bottom reform

60016
The EU has outlined new ‘vertical’ rules on distribution: Paul Henty reports
  • The EU Commission’s draft EU Vertical Agreements Block Exemption proposes changes to dual distribution, parity clauses, dual pricing and bans on active selling.
  • Following Brexit, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority is also consulting on a new instrument to replace the existing block exemption.

On 9 July 2021, the EU Commission released a draft version of the EU Vertical Agreements Block Exemption (VABE) for consultation, together with the accompanying vertical agreements guidelines. The proposed changes are significant for businesses.

Vertical agreements are those which relate to the supply of goods and services between parties at different levels of the supply chain.

The most obvious examples may occur in retail (for example, the supplier of luxury fashion items and a chain of high street stores) but the concept goes wider. In the construction context, examples of vertical arrangements would include an agreement between a manufacturer of materials and its wholesaler, or between a supplier of raw materials and a manufacturer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll