header-logo header-logo

08 October 2021 / Paul Henty
Issue: 7951 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Vertical agreements: top-to-bottom reform

60016
The EU has outlined new ‘vertical’ rules on distribution: Paul Henty reports
  • The EU Commission’s draft EU Vertical Agreements Block Exemption proposes changes to dual distribution, parity clauses, dual pricing and bans on active selling.
  • Following Brexit, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority is also consulting on a new instrument to replace the existing block exemption.

On 9 July 2021, the EU Commission released a draft version of the EU Vertical Agreements Block Exemption (VABE) for consultation, together with the accompanying vertical agreements guidelines. The proposed changes are significant for businesses.

Vertical agreements are those which relate to the supply of goods and services between parties at different levels of the supply chain.

The most obvious examples may occur in retail (for example, the supplier of luxury fashion items and a chain of high street stores) but the concept goes wider. In the construction context, examples of vertical arrangements would include an agreement between a manufacturer of materials and its wholesaler, or between a supplier of raw materials and a manufacturer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll