header-logo header-logo

Vetting system review

The head of the independent safeguarding authority is to clarify proposals announced last week for a vetting system for those working with children.

The head of the independent safeguarding authority is to clarify proposals announced last week for a vetting system for those working with children.

Speaking on the BBC Today programme, Sir Roger Singleton said that the system is necessary for the protection of children but agreed that some of the concerns raised over the system were valid.

“It’s quite reasonable for any parent to expect that if their school offers to provide transport… those people have been vetted to the point where there is no known reason why they should not work with children,” he said.

Sir Roger said he was surprised that some of the “legitimate concerns” raised over the scheme had not been voiced previously. Proposals for the scheme had first been set out three years ago in legislation. The introduction of the vetting system follows the recommendations set out in the Bichard inquiry following the Soham murders in 2002.

The NSPCC expressed support for the government’s plans, saying that the current criminal records checks were insufficient as they only revealed those people that had offended previously. The charity did however call on the government to clarify its approach.

“This new scheme must be introduced carefully, in a way that does not inadvertently penalise children, weaken community relationships, or provide parents with a false sense of security. The government must now provide clearer and more detailed information about the scheme and how it will work in practice,” the charity said.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
back-to-top-scroll