header-logo header-logo

22 May 2008
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Victory for non-Christians in religious discrimination case

News

A Christian charity acted illegally when it began recruiting only practising Christians for most posts and told existing non-Christian staff they were no longer eligible for promotion, an employment tribunal has ruled.

Mark Sheridan, who worked for Prospects—a charity for people with learning disabilities— for eight years, successfully claimed constructive dismissal before the Abergele tribunal after he quit his job in protest against the charity’s 2004 change in recruitment policy.

Hanne Stinson, chief executive of the British Humanist Association, says faith-based organisations will have to be much more stringent when they wish to discriminate on grounds of religion or belief in employment. He says that since the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 came into force, religious organisations are discriminating more in their employment practices. “The judgment makes clear that a court will make an objective assessment of what a ‘religious ethos’ is, and states that it is not for the religious organisation itself to define its ethos, where this does not accord with reality on the ground,” he adds.

Sheridan’s barrister, James Boddy, from 11 King’s Bench Walk Chambers, says: “This is the first time an employment tribunal has been called on to decide the extent to which an organisation with a religious ethos is allowed to discriminate on grounds of religion or belief.”

Issue: 7322 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll