header-logo header-logo

23 April 2009 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Opinion , Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Viewpoint

Stephen Gold District judge, Kingston-Upon-Thames County Court

'Few would argue about the blight of the Woolf reforms—the dreadful escalation in the cost of litigation. But the benefits go a long way towards wiping out the debit balance'

“Woolf has changed the attitude of procedural judges—the appellation enjoyed usually by district judges as they go about the task of case managing civil claims—and the rest of the judiciary.

And the attitude of the judiciary has been pivotal in bringing those benefits about. Practitioners will telephone judges when the occasion is appropriate and e-mail exchanges between the judiciary and practitioners are commonplace.

While the insufficiency of funding has stifled the development of IT for judicial use, even the crustier of judges can these days be found slaving over a hot laptop as they perfect their own orders and type their reserved judgments. Who would have thought that the very same judges who say 11 years ago were struggling to make themselves a cup of tea without the aid of an usher would now be tinkering a computer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll