header-logo header-logo

23 April 2009 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Opinion , Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Viewpoint

Stephen Gold District judge, Kingston-Upon-Thames County Court

'Few would argue about the blight of the Woolf reforms—the dreadful escalation in the cost of litigation. But the benefits go a long way towards wiping out the debit balance'

“Woolf has changed the attitude of procedural judges—the appellation enjoyed usually by district judges as they go about the task of case managing civil claims—and the rest of the judiciary.

And the attitude of the judiciary has been pivotal in bringing those benefits about. Practitioners will telephone judges when the occasion is appropriate and e-mail exchanges between the judiciary and practitioners are commonplace.

While the insufficiency of funding has stifled the development of IT for judicial use, even the crustier of judges can these days be found slaving over a hot laptop as they perfect their own orders and type their reserved judgments. Who would have thought that the very same judges who say 11 years ago were struggling to make themselves a cup of tea without the aid of an usher would now be tinkering a computer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll