header-logo header-logo

Viewpoint

23 April 2009 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Opinion , Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Stephen Gold District judge, Kingston-Upon-Thames County Court

'Few would argue about the blight of the Woolf reforms—the dreadful escalation in the cost of litigation. But the benefits go a long way towards wiping out the debit balance'

“Woolf has changed the attitude of procedural judges—the appellation enjoyed usually by district judges as they go about the task of case managing civil claims—and the rest of the judiciary.

And the attitude of the judiciary has been pivotal in bringing those benefits about. Practitioners will telephone judges when the occasion is appropriate and e-mail exchanges between the judiciary and practitioners are commonplace.

While the insufficiency of funding has stifled the development of IT for judicial use, even the crustier of judges can these days be found slaving over a hot laptop as they perfect their own orders and type their reserved judgments. Who would have thought that the very same judges who say 11 years ago were struggling to make themselves a cup of tea without the aid of an usher would now be tinkering a computer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll