header-logo header-logo

01 December 2017 / Tim Welch
Issue: 7772 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

A virtual reality?

Gig economy cases are changing the way courts consider employment status, as Tim Welch reports

  • A single statutory test requiring an individual to show that they are not working as part of their own business, or professional undertaking , would add a welcome degree of clarity to the law.

There are three categories of people engaged in work in the UK: the ‘employed’, the ‘worker’, and the ‘self-employed’. Being ‘employed’ means you have more employment rights than a ‘worker’ and being ‘self-employed’ gives you virtually none. The gig economy is ‘a labour market characterised by the prevalence of short-term contracts or freelance work as opposed to permanent jobs’. A common theme of recent gig economy cases is a contract which states unequivocally that the claimant is ‘self-employed’, and terms and conditions which purport to set out absolute freedom. But the courts are finding that such contracts are fictions, not reflecting the reality of the true working relationship.

Who is a worker?

Section 230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 996 defines ‘worker’ as: ‘any other contract…whereby the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll