header-logo header-logo

A virtual reality?

01 December 2017 / Tim Welch
Issue: 7772 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Gig economy cases are changing the way courts consider employment status, as Tim Welch reports

  • A single statutory test requiring an individual to show that they are not working as part of their own business, or professional undertaking , would add a welcome degree of clarity to the law.

There are three categories of people engaged in work in the UK: the ‘employed’, the ‘worker’, and the ‘self-employed’. Being ‘employed’ means you have more employment rights than a ‘worker’ and being ‘self-employed’ gives you virtually none. The gig economy is ‘a labour market characterised by the prevalence of short-term contracts or freelance work as opposed to permanent jobs’. A common theme of recent gig economy cases is a contract which states unequivocally that the claimant is ‘self-employed’, and terms and conditions which purport to set out absolute freedom. But the courts are finding that such contracts are fictions, not reflecting the reality of the true working relationship.

Who is a worker?

Section 230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 996 defines ‘worker’ as: ‘any other contract…whereby

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll