header-logo header-logo

01 December 2017 / Tim Welch
Issue: 7772 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

A virtual reality?

Gig economy cases are changing the way courts consider employment status, as Tim Welch reports

  • A single statutory test requiring an individual to show that they are not working as part of their own business, or professional undertaking , would add a welcome degree of clarity to the law.

There are three categories of people engaged in work in the UK: the ‘employed’, the ‘worker’, and the ‘self-employed’. Being ‘employed’ means you have more employment rights than a ‘worker’ and being ‘self-employed’ gives you virtually none. The gig economy is ‘a labour market characterised by the prevalence of short-term contracts or freelance work as opposed to permanent jobs’. A common theme of recent gig economy cases is a contract which states unequivocally that the claimant is ‘self-employed’, and terms and conditions which purport to set out absolute freedom. But the courts are finding that such contracts are fictions, not reflecting the reality of the true working relationship.

Who is a worker?

Section 230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 996 defines ‘worker’ as: ‘any other contract…whereby the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll