header-logo header-logo

Walking the tightrope

04 November 2016 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7721 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail
nlj_7721_dobson

The Scottish “named person” service is unlawful, says Nicholas Dobson

  • The information sharing provisions in Pt 4 of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 are incompatible with the rights of children, young persons and parents and may in practice result in a disproportionate interference with their Art 8 rights.

Child welfare is a pressing and emotional national concern. Children are inherently vulnerable and obviously need careful nurturing and protection to ensure their healthy growth and development. But striking a fair and lawful balance between the rights of children and those of their parents or guardians is rather like walking a swaying tightrope. Nevertheless, this tightrope must be successfully navigated by any venturing to legislate in this area.

The Scottish government consequently came unstuck with its undoubtedly well-meaning “named person” provisions in Pt 4 of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 (the Act). For on 28 July 2016 the Supreme Court in The Christian Institute and others v. The Lord Advocate (Scotland) [2016] UKSC 51, [2016] All ER (D) 156 (Jul),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll