header-logo header-logo

Weekly law digests

06 June 2019
Issue: 7843 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Company

Re Pantiles Investments Ltd (in liquidation); Pantiles Investments Ltd (in liquidation) and another v Winckler [2019] EWHC 1298 (Ch), [2019] All ER (D) 134 (May)

The respondent former director of the first applicant company in liquidation had knowingly been a party to the use of the company for the purposes of defrauding a bankrupt’s creditors and had been in breach of her duties as director. The Chancery Division, in allowing the company’s liquidator claim against the respondent, further held that ss 21 and 32 of the Limitation Act 1980 disapplied the primary limitation period in relation to a loan, whether that breach was characterised as fraudulent or negligent.

Contempt

Zurich Insurance plc v Romaine [2019] EWCA Civ 851, [2019] All ER (D) 127 (May)

The appellant insurance company’s appeal succeeded, against a decision of a judge of the High Court not to allow it to commence committal proceedings against the respondent. The respondent had issued personal injury proceedings, but had discontinued them after evidence had emerged of him having made false statements.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll