header-logo header-logo

09 November 2012 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7537 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Welfare warfare

child_welfare_4

Jonathan Herring discusses the nature of child welfare

The Court of Appeal judgment in Re G (Children) [2012] EWCA Civ 1233, [2012] All ER (D) 50 (Oct) is a tour de force. It provides an analysis of the welfare principle of considerable erudition. Aristotle, Orthodox Judaism and notions of 21st century parenting are all covered.

The case involved five children of an ultra-orthodox Jewish family. The parents had separated and disagreed over whom the children should live with and their religious education.

The nature of welfare

It is surprising that the notions of welfare and best interests have been little analysed by the courts. What is beneficial for someone, or what makes for a good life, can be controversial. Looking around your friends, you will probably quickly spot a range of ways people seek to pursue their vision of the good life. Whether it is seeking riches, achievement, virtue or love; we all have our goals we strive for. Yet which of these, or more realistically what combinations of these, should

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll