header-logo header-logo

Welfare warfare

09 November 2012 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7537 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail
child_welfare_4

Jonathan Herring discusses the nature of child welfare

The Court of Appeal judgment in Re G (Children) [2012] EWCA Civ 1233, [2012] All ER (D) 50 (Oct) is a tour de force. It provides an analysis of the welfare principle of considerable erudition. Aristotle, Orthodox Judaism and notions of 21st century parenting are all covered.

The case involved five children of an ultra-orthodox Jewish family. The parents had separated and disagreed over whom the children should live with and their religious education.

The nature of welfare

It is surprising that the notions of welfare and best interests have been little analysed by the courts. What is beneficial for someone, or what makes for a good life, can be controversial. Looking around your friends, you will probably quickly spot a range of ways people seek to pursue their vision of the good life. Whether it is seeking riches, achievement, virtue or love; we all have our goals we strive for. Yet which of these, or more realistically what combinations of these, should

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll