header-logo header-logo

What next for benchmark manipulation claims?

14 March 2017 / Andy McGregor , Chris Whitehouse
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial , Litigation trends
printer mail-detail

Post-PAG, will claimants able to evidence fraud have greater prospects of success? Andy McGregor & Chris Whitehouse report

  • Where does Property Alliance Group v RBS leave benchmark manipulation claims?
  • Prospects of success will be enhanced if a party had substantive discussions with the relevant bank about LIBOR.
  • There is reason for greater optimism for potential claims relating to allegations of Forex manipulation.

In December the High Court handed down judgment in Property Alliance Group (PAG) v RBS [2016] EWHC 207 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 13 (Mar), to date the most comprehensive judicial analysis of a claim for damages in relation to LIBOR manipulation. This article considers the court's analysis of PAG's arguments and the implications for future LIBOR cases or other benchmark manipulation claims such as Forex.

LIBOR & why it matters

LIBOR, the London Interbank Offered Rate, is a series of daily interest rate benchmarks (in various currencies) administered by the British Banking Association (BBA) theoretically reflective of the cost of unsecured interbank

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll