header-logo header-logo

What next for benchmark manipulation claims?

14 March 2017 / Andy McGregor , Chris Whitehouse
Issue: 7739 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial , Litigation trends
printer mail-detail

Post-PAG, will claimants able to evidence fraud have greater prospects of success? Andy McGregor & Chris Whitehouse report

  • Where does Property Alliance Group v RBS leave benchmark manipulation claims?
  • Prospects of success will be enhanced if a party had substantive discussions with the relevant bank about LIBOR.
  • There is reason for greater optimism for potential claims relating to allegations of Forex manipulation.

In December the High Court handed down judgment in Property Alliance Group (PAG) v RBS [2016] EWHC 207 (Ch), [2016] All ER (D) 13 (Mar), to date the most comprehensive judicial analysis of a claim for damages in relation to LIBOR manipulation. This article considers the court's analysis of PAG's arguments and the implications for future LIBOR cases or other benchmark manipulation claims such as Forex.

LIBOR & why it matters

LIBOR, the London Interbank Offered Rate, is a series of daily interest rate benchmarks (in various currencies) administered by the British Banking Association (BBA) theoretically reflective of the cost of unsecured interbank

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll