header-logo header-logo

10 July 2009 / Stephen Mason
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Opinion , Banking
printer mail-detail

When the chips are down

The bank, the PIN & the ATM, by Stephen Mason

The ATM and plastic card have become central to our lives, yet the technology is not perfect. Should the bank refuse to accept withdrawals were the result of the actions of a thief, the customer’s only option may be to take legal action to recover their money. This happened to Mr Job, and although a number of commentators considered this trial to be a test case, the judge made it clear that this was not. Nevertheless it was a highly unusual case. For instance, there is extensive case law in Germany, comprising decisions by courts of first instance and appellate courts in relation to PINs and ATMs, yet the case of Job appears to be the first case of its kind in the United Kingdom that has gone to trial.

The facts

Seven cash withdrawals totalling £2,100 were withdrawn from Mr Job’s account in February 2006 by way of two ATMs in Reading. Mr Job said he did not make the withdrawals,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll