13 February 2026 / Masood Ahmed , Sanjay Dave Singh

Issue: 8149 / Categories: Features , Costs , Procedure & practice , Mediation , ADR , Dispute resolution

When refusal to mediate may not bite

What are the costs penalties when a defendant won’t mediate? Masood Ahmed & Sanjay Dave Singh consider the case law

This article examines the court’s treatment of a defendant’s refusal to mediate, illustrated in Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd.
It pays particular attention to the claimant’s costs arguments arising from that refusal.

It is trite law that a court may penalise a party in costs for refusing to engage with alternative dispute resolution (ADR) or simply ignoring an invitation to engage with ADR (CPR 44.4, Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416; Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [2004] EWCA Civ 576; PGF II SA v OMFS Co 1 Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1288; Northamber Plc v Genee World Ltd and others [2024] EWCA Civ 428). However, such adverse consequences are not automatic, as illustrated by the recent decision in Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd [2025] EWHC 503 (KB).

Following the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

When refusal to mediate may not bite

What are the costs penalties when a defendant won’t mediate? Masood Ahmed & Sanjay Dave Singh consider the case law

This article examines the court’s treatment of a defendant’s refusal to mediate, illustrated in Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd.
It pays particular attention to the claimant’s costs arguments arising from that refusal.

Following the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation

NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere

Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group

NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall

A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision

NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?

An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading

Error message

When refusal to mediate may not bite

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Blake Morgan—four promotions