13 February 2026 / Masood Ahmed , Sanjay Dave Singh

Issue: 8149 / Categories: Features , Costs , Procedure & practice , Mediation , ADR , Dispute resolution

When refusal to mediate may not bite

What are the costs penalties when a defendant won’t mediate? Masood Ahmed & Sanjay Dave Singh consider the case law

This article examines the court’s treatment of a defendant’s refusal to mediate, illustrated in Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd.
It pays particular attention to the claimant’s costs arguments arising from that refusal.

It is trite law that a court may penalise a party in costs for refusing to engage with alternative dispute resolution (ADR) or simply ignoring an invitation to engage with ADR (CPR 44.4, Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416; Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [2004] EWCA Civ 576; PGF II SA v OMFS Co 1 Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1288; Northamber Plc v Genee World Ltd and others [2024] EWCA Civ 428). However, such adverse consequences are not automatic, as illustrated by the recent decision in Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd [2025] EWHC 503 (KB).

Following the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

When refusal to mediate may not bite

What are the costs penalties when a defendant won’t mediate? Masood Ahmed & Sanjay Dave Singh consider the case law

This article examines the court’s treatment of a defendant’s refusal to mediate, illustrated in Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd.
It pays particular attention to the claimant’s costs arguments arising from that refusal.

Following the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations

What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection?

NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR

Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?

NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap

When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases

When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ

Charities Appeals Supplement: March 2026

NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue

Error message

When refusal to mediate may not bite

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean