header-logo header-logo

When timeshares turn to nightmares

01 February 2018 / David Partington
Issue: 7779 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
nlj_7779_partington

Timeshare contracts can trap the unawares into lengthy commitments. David Partington presents some innovative means of escape

  • Raises potential ways to tackle timeshare contracts under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.
  • Introduces the idea of proceeding against lenders who finance such contracts under s 140A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

This is a brief introduction to what is a hugely complex topic, defending liability or seeking redress in respect of timeshare contracts. Before I do that, I need to explain two matters. One is the central ‘mischief’ of timeshare contracts. The second is the structure of such contracts.

The central mischief is that clients find themselves bound to very long contractual obligations with no express ‘exit’ provisions, although there are various policies which some companies say they operate in cases of extreme hardship, old age (say 75 years) or death. At the same time the client is bound to pay an annual management fee in the nature of a service charge, whether or not they are able to access the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll