header-logo header-logo

12 August 2020 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7899 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Where there’s a will; there’s a way (Pt 2)

25783
Government has clarified its COVID–19 wills plans, but some misconceptions remain, as Dr Nicholas Bevan explains

In brief

  • Is the government’s proposed emergency legislation sanctioning video witnessing of wills a lost opportunity?

It is common knowledge that self-isolating and vulnerable people are encountering considerable practical difficulties in making their wills during this pandemic. The chief obstacle being that to be valid, a will must be signed in the presence of two witnesses.

In Part 1 I explained that while s 9 of the Wills Act 1837 (WA 1837) insists on strict conformity with its prescriptive formalities for a will’s validity, the common law has consistently applied a broad construction to its wording.This latitude has been applied to terms such as ‘writing’, ‘signed’ and ‘presence’ to accommodate social and technical developments; subject to the caveat that any innovation must not detract from 9’s legislative objective of protecting testators from fraud. However, in the context of the coronavirus, it is widely believed that a testamentary witness’s ‘presence’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll