header-logo header-logo

12 January 2017
Issue: 7729 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Whiplash reforms: a special case for motorcyclists

Motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians should be exempt from the government’s proposed “whiplash” reforms, one of the UK’s largest personal injury firms has said.

Fletcher’s Solicitors, which handles about 30% of motorcycle accidents in England and Wales, said a blanket approach would risk denying justice to vulnerable groups. It said about 18,000 motorcyclists make up ten per cent of all casualties despite motorcyclists only accounting for 1% of all road use. 

The Ministry of Justice proposals aim to deter fraud by removing compensation for minor whiplash claims or replacing it with a fixed sum. The Ministry would also raise the small claims limit from £1,000 to £5,000 in personal injury claims—costs cannot be recovered in the small claims court, even if successful.

Ed Fletcher, CEO of Fletchers Solicitors, said: “We estimate less than 0.0002% of motorcycle claims involve findings of dishonesty.

“The proposals also fail to take into account the complex nature of accidents involving vulnerable road users who aren’t protected by a car when an impact takes place. Not only are their injuries more complex and varied as a result, but also, in our experience, the question of who is to blame is twice as likely to be disputed in motorcycle cases compared to the average motor claim.”

Fletcher said any reforms should emphasise the distinction between “occupants of a vehicle” and vulnerable road users.

The consultation, Reforming the soft tissue injury (whiplash) claims process, closed last week. A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said it would be “some weeks” before it publishes its response.

Issue: 7729 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll