header-logo header-logo

Whistle while you work

31 October 2019 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7862 / Categories: Features , Employment , Discrimination , Profession , Human rights , Public
printer mail-detail
Nicholas Dobson analyses the recent decision extending protection to those who blow the whistle while on the Bench
  • To comply with Convention rights, the Employment Rights Act 1996 should be read and effected to extend its whistle-blowing protection to judicial office-holders.

Many may still see judges as rather like W.S. Gilbert’s Lord Chancellor. For, as he intoned in Iolanthe: ‘The Law is the true embodiment/Of everything that’s excellent. It has no kind of fault or flaw/And I, my Lords, embody the Law.’

But while Gilbert’s satire may once have contained a generous grain of truth, modern judges are more likely to be working unremittingly and stressfully hard in imperfect conditions and with inadequate support. And, although this may surprise many, judges are in fact human and can suffer serious workplace detriments. But while ‘workers’ benefit from whistle-blowing protection (for, among other things, breach of legal obligations or danger to health and safety under Part IVA of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996)), this has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll