header-logo header-logo

31 October 2019 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7862 / Categories: Features , Employment , Discrimination , Profession , Human rights , Public
printer mail-detail

Whistle while you work

Nicholas Dobson analyses the recent decision extending protection to those who blow the whistle while on the Bench
  • To comply with Convention rights, the Employment Rights Act 1996 should be read and effected to extend its whistle-blowing protection to judicial office-holders.

Many may still see judges as rather like W.S. Gilbert’s Lord Chancellor. For, as he intoned in Iolanthe: ‘The Law is the true embodiment/Of everything that’s excellent. It has no kind of fault or flaw/And I, my Lords, embody the Law.’

But while Gilbert’s satire may once have contained a generous grain of truth, modern judges are more likely to be working unremittingly and stressfully hard in imperfect conditions and with inadequate support. And, although this may surprise many, judges are in fact human and can suffer serious workplace detriments. But while ‘workers’ benefit from whistle-blowing protection (for, among other things, breach of legal obligations or danger to health and safety under Part IVA of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996)), this has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll