header-logo header-logo

31 October 2019 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7862 / Categories: Features , Employment , Discrimination , Profession , Human rights , Public
printer mail-detail

Whistle while you work

Nicholas Dobson analyses the recent decision extending protection to those who blow the whistle while on the Bench
  • To comply with Convention rights, the Employment Rights Act 1996 should be read and effected to extend its whistle-blowing protection to judicial office-holders.

Many may still see judges as rather like W.S. Gilbert’s Lord Chancellor. For, as he intoned in Iolanthe: ‘The Law is the true embodiment/Of everything that’s excellent. It has no kind of fault or flaw/And I, my Lords, embody the Law.’

But while Gilbert’s satire may once have contained a generous grain of truth, modern judges are more likely to be working unremittingly and stressfully hard in imperfect conditions and with inadequate support. And, although this may surprise many, judges are in fact human and can suffer serious workplace detriments. But while ‘workers’ benefit from whistle-blowing protection (for, among other things, breach of legal obligations or danger to health and safety under Part IVA of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996)), this has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll