header-logo header-logo

02 December 2019
Issue: 7867 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Whistleblowing was 'real reason'

The Supreme Court has extended the scope of protection for whistleblowers, in a ruling that a Royal Mail employee was unfairly dismissed

Royal Mail Group v Jhuti [2019] UKSC 55 concerned media specialist Ms Jhuti who alerted her manager at Royal Mail about concerns that a colleague was infringing Ofcom’s guidance. In the four-hour meeting that followed, however, she was told her understanding of the guidance was questionable and formed the impression her job was at risk if she pursued her allegations further. She retracted her claim. Thereafter, she was told her performance at work was disappointing, and was eventually signed off work with stress and later dismissed.

The Supreme Court unanimously held that the real reason for her dismissal was that she made protected disclosures rather than her manager’s ‘invented reason’. 

Issue: 7867 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll