header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

The role of lawyers in mediation: whose child is it anyway?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
06 August 2021 / Bryan Clark
Issue: 7944 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Mediation , ADR
printer mail-detail
54502
Post-Kumar, Bryan Clark considers the use of legal representation within mediation when individuals are pitted against institutions
  • The right of a parent in to be represented in an additional support needs mediation by a lawyer under the Children and Families Act.
  • Pros and cons of involving lawyers in mediation.

The case of Kumar v London Borough of Hillingdon [2020] EWHC 3326 (admin), [2020] All ER (D) 34 (Dec) entailed a judicial review brought by Kumar against her local authority. The matter at hand concerned the use of mediation in the Special Education Needs (SEN) context under the Children and Families Act 2014 (CFA 2014). The particular issue in question was whether the local authority had acted lawfully in refusing Kumar’s request to be represented in the mediation by a solicitor. While this case represents an interesting exercise in statutory interpretation it also holds a wider resonance about the utility of legal representation within mediation.

Facts of the case

Kumar’s son, a child

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur under scrutiny
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
NLJ this week: Does dishonesty always mean strike-off?
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
NLJ this week: Potanin, prenups & privacy
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
NLJ this week: Malaysia’s arbitration overhaul
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
NLJ this week: Greed but no fraud in £1.4bn SKAT case
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll