header-logo header-logo

Whose land is it anyway?

18 July 2025 / John Martin
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail
225828
Agricultural archives are a valuable (but neglected) resource for resolving access rights, writes Professor John Martin
  • Resolving land access disputes often hinges on overlooked historical records, such as the National Farm Survey and War Agricultural Executive Committee files.
  • Second world war-era surveys and committee documents offer detailed insights into land use, ownership and farm conditions, with many now accessible via the National Archives.

Investigating access disputes, together with a multitude of other rights and obligations regarding agricultural land, can be problematic, given the paucity of verifiable archival material that appears to be available. This is often compounded by the prevalence of what are often rather vague and contradictory ingrained verbal recollections. For those faced with the challenge of investigating agricultural disputes, a number of often largely neglected documentary sources can be accessed. These include the National Farm Survey 1941–43 and the records of the War Agricultural Committees, which directed the food production campaign in the second world war. There are also a wide range of relevant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll