header-logo header-logo

Training: Why it pays to grow your own

01 April 2020 / Lynne Squires
Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
18631
Lynne Squires recommends investing in training to then reap the rewards
  • Skill gaps: training existing employees.
  • Increasing workforce diversity: paths to progression.
  • New technology and AI: looking for the opportunities.

Whether you are looking to attract and retain talented employees, want to increase the diversity of your workforce or to introduce new technology to improve productivity, ensuring you have a strong workforce development plan is key to the success of all law firms.

It’s common for firms to focus on recruitment when looking to fill skills gaps and in some cases you may want to bring in new people, but there are considerable benefits to looking at your entire workforce, non-lawyers included, and considering how you can train existing employees in the skills you need.

Offering training and opening up new career paths for paralegals and administrative staff is a great way to motivate employees and retain those who might otherwise be looking to move elsewhere.

High staff turnover can be costly, with huge recruitment fees

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll