header-logo header-logo

Willpower & determination

19 May 2017 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7746 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
nlj_7746_fudakowska

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason provide a wills & probate update

  • Will construction case regarding the scope of the definition of ‘grandchildren’.
  • Appeal of an award to a cohabitant under the I(PFD) Act 1975.

H and v George [2017] EWHC 533 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 147 (Mar) considers if the definition of ‘grandchildren’ in the testator’s will should include adopted grandchildren.

Henry Hand (HH) died in 1947. His will gave life interests to his three children, with the remainder to their own children in equal shares. At the time of trial his children were all dead. His daughter had had two biological children (the defendants) and one of his sons had adopted two children (the claimants) in 1948 and 1950 respectively.

The provision of HH’s will which stated that the remainder of his residue should pass to his children’s ‘children’ was in dispute. The claimants advanced that the definition of children should be interpreted to include adopted children. The defendants argued that the interpretation of ‘children’ was restricted to ‘biological children’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll