header-logo header-logo

19 May 2017 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7746 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Willpower & determination

nlj_7746_fudakowska

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason provide a wills & probate update

  • Will construction case regarding the scope of the definition of ‘grandchildren’.
  • Appeal of an award to a cohabitant under the I(PFD) Act 1975.

H and v George [2017] EWHC 533 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 147 (Mar) considers if the definition of ‘grandchildren’ in the testator’s will should include adopted grandchildren.

Henry Hand (HH) died in 1947. His will gave life interests to his three children, with the remainder to their own children in equal shares. At the time of trial his children were all dead. His daughter had had two biological children (the defendants) and one of his sons had adopted two children (the claimants) in 1948 and 1950 respectively.

The provision of HH’s will which stated that the remainder of his residue should pass to his children’s ‘children’ was in dispute. The claimants advanced that the definition of children should be interpreted to include adopted children. The defendants argued that the interpretation of ‘children’ was restricted to ‘biological children’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll