header-logo header-logo

Wills and probate

04 January 2007 / Helen Peacock , Paola Fudakowska , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7254 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Paul Hewitt, Paola Fudakowska and Helen Peacock discuss contested wills and claims against personal representatives

Limitation period for claims against personal representatives
 Angela Green (1) Sheila Ross (2) Katherine Toms (3) v Margaret Gaul (1) Michael Loftus (2) Dexter Gaul (3) [2006] EWCA Civ 1124, [2006] 4 All ER 1110

Ivor Loftus died on 11 August 1990 apparently intestate. He had six children, one of whom predeceased him leaving no issue. Letters of administration were granted to Margaret Gaul (M), Loftus’ daughter, without the knowledge of her siblings. The judge at first instance referred to a “culture of dishonesty” evidenced by tax evasion and imprisonment of one of the protagonists for fraud. At first instance both sides were found to have lied under oath.
The dispute centred around a builder’s yard which M claimed she had been allowed to retain under a compromise agreement concluded by the family in May 1992. Following this, M assented the yard to herself and in 1999 transferred it to her son Dexter Gaul (the third defendant)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll