header-logo header-logo

Wills and probate

04 January 2007 / Helen Peacock , Paola Fudakowska , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7254 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Paul Hewitt, Paola Fudakowska and Helen Peacock discuss contested wills and claims against personal representatives

Limitation period for claims against personal representatives
 Angela Green (1) Sheila Ross (2) Katherine Toms (3) v Margaret Gaul (1) Michael Loftus (2) Dexter Gaul (3) [2006] EWCA Civ 1124, [2006] 4 All ER 1110

Ivor Loftus died on 11 August 1990 apparently intestate. He had six children, one of whom predeceased him leaving no issue. Letters of administration were granted to Margaret Gaul (M), Loftus’ daughter, without the knowledge of her siblings. The judge at first instance referred to a “culture of dishonesty” evidenced by tax evasion and imprisonment of one of the protagonists for fraud. At first instance both sides were found to have lied under oath.
The dispute centred around a builder’s yard which M claimed she had been allowed to retain under a compromise agreement concluded by the family in May 1992. Following this, M assented the yard to herself and in 1999 transferred it to her son Dexter Gaul (the third defendant)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll