header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 January 2007 / Helen Peacock , Paola Fudakowska , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7254 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Wills and probate

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Paul Hewitt, Paola Fudakowska and Helen Peacock discuss contested wills and claims against personal representatives

Limitation period for claims against personal representatives
 Angela Green (1) Sheila Ross (2) Katherine Toms (3) v Margaret Gaul (1) Michael Loftus (2) Dexter Gaul (3) [2006] EWCA Civ 1124, [2006] 4 All ER 1110

Ivor Loftus died on 11 August 1990 apparently intestate. He had six children, one of whom predeceased him leaving no issue. Letters of administration were granted to Margaret Gaul (M), Loftus’ daughter, without the knowledge of her siblings. The judge at first instance referred to a “culture of dishonesty” evidenced by tax evasion and imprisonment of one of the protagonists for fraud. At first instance both sides were found to have lied under oath.
The dispute centred around a builder’s yard which M claimed she had been allowed to retain under a compromise agreement concluded by the family in May 1992. Following this, M assented the yard to herself and in 1999 transferred it to her son Dexter Gaul (the third

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
NLJ this week: Family law urged to ditch adversarial instincts
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll