header-logo header-logo

13 February 2026 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 8149 / Categories: Features , Dispute resolution
printer mail-detail

Winners & losers!

242551
Mark Pawlowski takes a look at some of the legal pitfalls associated with lottery syndicates

It is not uncommon for a number of people to form a syndicate to subscribe for weekly tickets to the National Lottery. Invariably, there will be no written rules of the syndicate and the members will rarely consider the question of how any winnings (large or small) should be divided, particularly in the event of a member failing to pay the required sum or if the required subscription is paid not by the member themselves but by a partner or friend. To whom will the winnings belong in these circumstances?

It’s all mine!

In Abrahams v Trustee of the property of Abrahams [1999] Lexis Citation 3432, the claimant, who was separated from her husband, paid £1 a week for her own place in a lottery syndicate, plus a further £1 for her husband. The syndicate won over £3m , and the claimant’s one-fifteenth share amounted to £242,155.13. The claimant, however, also claimed her husband’s share, relying on the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll