header-logo header-logo

Withdrawal (dis)agreement

16 September 2020 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7902 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
27510
Michael Zander pins down the issues of the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill
  • The United Kingdom Internal Market Bill: a breach of international law?


Sir John Major, Theresa May, Michael Howard, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron, the former Conservative Attorney-General, Sir Geoffrey Cox, and Sajid Javid were just some of the biggest names who weighed in against the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill.

The issue they all highlighted was that in relation to goods moving from Northern Ireland to Great Britain, cl 42 would permit UK Ministers to disapply exit procedures required by the Northern Ireland Protocol which is part of the Withdrawal Agreement—and that this would be a breach of international law. The same applies to cl 43.

Level playing field

Article 10 of the Northern Ireland Protocol aims to secure that state aid affecting trade between Northern Ireland and the EU is subject to the principle of ‘the level playing field’. Clause 43 gives the secretary of state the power to disapply that part of the Protocol.

Clause

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll