header-logo header-logo

16 September 2020 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7902 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Withdrawal (dis)agreement

27510
Michael Zander pins down the issues of the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill
  • The United Kingdom Internal Market Bill: a breach of international law?


Sir John Major, Theresa May, Michael Howard, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron, the former Conservative Attorney-General, Sir Geoffrey Cox, and Sajid Javid were just some of the biggest names who weighed in against the United Kingdom Internal Market Bill.

The issue they all highlighted was that in relation to goods moving from Northern Ireland to Great Britain, cl 42 would permit UK Ministers to disapply exit procedures required by the Northern Ireland Protocol which is part of the Withdrawal Agreement—and that this would be a breach of international law. The same applies to cl 43.

Level playing field

Article 10 of the Northern Ireland Protocol aims to secure that state aid affecting trade between Northern Ireland and the EU is subject to the principle of ‘the level playing field’. Clause 43 gives the secretary of state the power to disapply that part of the Protocol.

Clause

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll