header-logo header-logo

23 February 2021
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Withers—Philip Reed

Withers welcomes new charity law partner Philip Reed in London

International law firm Withers has hired charity law and philanthropy specialist Philip Reed as a partner in its London office. Philip joins the firm's market-leading charity team, which is known for its innovations and exceptional client base.

Philip joins Withers from Farrer & Co, where he was Counsel in the firm's charity & community team, working with domestic and foreign clients of all sizes, including major national groups. He has also acted as in-house legal adviser and company secretary for the Leonard Cheshire charity.

Philip's practice includes advising charities and not-for-profit organisations on governance and strategic matters, mergers and restructuring, establishment and registration, trading and their relationships with non-charitable subsidiaries, tax, fundraising and regulatory issues. Alongside operational charities, Philip's clients also include grant-making foundations, educational institutions and philanthropists.

Chris Priestley, joint head of Withers' Charities & Philanthropy team, comments: "Philip's move to join us is a significant one in a fairly static market and we are so pleased to welcome him to our team. We are known for offering innovative solutions to clients' issues, and have led the field on the creation of new philanthropic tools, such as dual-qualified structures to offer greater giving flexibility. With Philip onboard, we will further develop our international philanthropy work, alongside our partner Alana Petraske in New York."

Philip adds: "I have known and admired Withers' charity team and their commitment to the not-for-profit sector for many years. I am very excited to be joining the firm and working with skilled new colleagues and a first-rate list of clients. I look forward to growing a broad practice covering philanthropic solutions alongside regulatory and operational advice for some of the country's most significant charity clients."

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Newcastle & North of England Law Society—Lesley Fairclough

Newcastle & North of England Law Society—Lesley Fairclough

Ward Hadaway partner becomes bicentennial president following regional merger

Devonshires—four promotions

Devonshires—four promotions

Firm promotes four senior associates to partner in annual round

Fieldfisher—John McElroy & Daniel Hayward

Fieldfisher—John McElroy & Daniel Hayward

Co-heads of dispute resolution practice appointed alongside partner promotions

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll