header-logo header-logo

10 July 2008
Issue: 7329 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Witness anonymity Bill rushed through by Straw

Legal news

Emergency legislation to allow witnesses to give evidence in court anonymously has been rushed before Parliament by justice secretary, Jack Straw.

The Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill will restore a trial judge’s power to grant a witness anonymity order (WAO), after the House of Lords in R v Davis ruled that they breached the right to a fair trial under Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The law lords said legislation was needed to allow WAOs to continue.

The new law will allow courts to hear evidence anonymously where witnesses are fearful of the consequences of being identified. It will also ensure those convicted on the basis of anonymous evidence cannot have their conviction quashed solely on the grounds that anonymit y was granted. The government claims it will not compromise a defendant’s right to a fair trial but JUSTICE claims the Bill is “misconceived and poorly drafted”. Eric Metcalfe, JUSTICE’s director of human rights policy says: “More money needs to be put into actually protecting witnesses, instead of rushed legislation to conceal their identities.”

Law Society president, Andrew Holroyd, has urged MPs to ensure the legislation is robust enough to prevent witness anonymity becoming a routine request made without good reason.

Issue: 7329 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll