header-logo header-logo

15 April 2016 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7694 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Witness headaches

001_nlj_7694_pamplin

Dr Chris Pamplin looks at what can happen if an expert witness is prevented from attending for bona fide reasons

It can be argued that in an adversarial justice system, natural justice demands that each party should have a fair and equal opportunity to test the witness evidence. But how far should this requirement be allowed to override more practical matters imposed on a busy and expensive court system? The court can order the attendance of a witness, but what if a witness is prevented from attending for bona fide reasons?

When an expert falls ill

Mr Justice Foskett pondered these matters in a High Court application in Robshaw v United Lincolnshire Hospital NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 923 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 21 (Apr). The court considered an application to adjourn a clinical negligence trial based on the defendant’s inability to cross-examine one of the claimant’s expert witnesses who was ill.

The claimant in the case had sought to rely on the expert evidence of a consultant paediatric neurologist (Dr F). Since the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Dawson Cornwell—Russell Bywater

Dawson Cornwell—Russell Bywater

Family law firm appoints new managing partner and head of matrimonial department

Forbes Solicitors—Katy Parkinson & Paul Hatton

Forbes Solicitors—Katy Parkinson & Paul Hatton

Employment and commercial offering strengthened by double hire

Birketts—Duncan Reed

Birketts—Duncan Reed

Regulatory and corporate defence team expands with Bristol partner hire

NEWS
Sophie Charlton of Vardags in London has been announced as the latest winner of AlphaBiolabs’ Giving Back initiative, with her nomination directing a donation to Reunite International
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
back-to-top-scroll