header-logo header-logo

02 September 2014
Issue: 7620 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Wolstenholmes directors disqualified

Seven former members of Wolstenholmes LLP have now been disqualified from acting as directors following the largest failure of any incorporated solicitors practice to date.

More than £13.39m has had to be paid out from the compensation fund so far relating to 2,558 claims as a result of fraudulent trading practices and failure to keep proper books and records. 

Former members Waseem Saddique and Mario Cardinali failed to attend the hearing before Judge Bird at Manchester District Registry where they were disqualified for the maximum 15 years. 

The hearing heard how conveyancing clients paid money for stamp duty land tax but Wolstenholmes filed false returns and kept some of the money.

Bird J said: “One helpful result of the secretary of state’s exhaustive investigation into this matter is that it has been found that a sum of in excess of £27,000, which can be traced to such land tax payments, was paid to an unconnected company with which Mr Saddique was connected. As was pointed out, that part of the case comprises a small part of the overall losses suffered.”

Saddique acted as a member of Wolstenholmes at a time when he was an undischarged bankrupt and so automatically disqualified.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) first visited the Midlands practice in September 2009, uncovering serious accounting irregularities. A subsequent investigation found an £8m shortfall in the practice’s client account.

Wolstenholme members Imran Hussain and Asma Qayum were struck off, Bilal Khawaja and Helen Murgatroyd were suspended for one and two years, respectively. The case against Nasir Ilyas will be heard in October. The SRA has banned Saddique, Cardinali, Mohammed Kazi and Iftab Hussain from working with a solicitor’s practice without its permission.

David Middleton, executive director, legal, SRA, says: “The tribunal recorded the fact that this was perhaps the most serious case it had ever dealt with.”

 

Issue: 7620 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll