header-logo header-logo

14 July 2023
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity , Equality
printer mail-detail

Women lawyers give verdict on which workplace equality measures work best

Mentoring and coaching are effective, but external diversity pledges are less so when it comes to tearing down barriers to women’s progress at work, according to the latest research from the Next 100 Years project.

Women in the legal profession gave their verdict on a variety of gender equality initiatives for the research report, published this week. Notably, while 67% of women believe their workplace is committed to removing barriers to women’s progress, only 45% think current measures are working effectively. So, what works best?

Most legal sector workplaces now offer remote or hybrid working (88%) and part-time working (68%)—both measures considered to be very effective by the women surveyed. The research suggests more practical support and increased flexibility would see organisations make further strides.

The survey respondents also recommended mentoring and coaching—less than half workplaces undertake this but 79% of women considered it effective. Flexi-time (offered by less than a third of workplaces) also came highly recommended by 79% of women.

While only one in five workplaces offer additional support for maternity returners, 72% consider it an effective approach. Women’s networks (available at 39% of workplaces) were also popular, with 69% considering them effective.

A majority of respondents also recommended financial support for childcare (offered by 5% of workplaces), gender diverse client teams (implemented by 12%) and enhanced paternity leave (offered by 22%).

External diversity pledges were considered to be the least effective measure, with only 36% considering them to be effective and 27% considering them ineffective.

The respondents welcomed the post-pandemic move to more hybrid and part-time working, but expressed some fears about the impact such working patterns have on the allocation of work between men and women. One in five respondents believe work is unfairly allocated, and only 54% felt confident about fair allocation. More than half thought part-time working meant they were not given the best work. More than a third expressed the same fear about working from home.

Overall, four themes emerged from the report regarding what changes would make the most difference. These were the need for:

  • fair and transparent recruitment and promotion processes;
  • accountability, with leadership taking responsibility;
  • support for working parents; and
  • societal change relating to gender stereotypes about the roles of women and men.

Dana Denis-Smith, founder of the Next 100 Years and CEO of Obelisk Support, said: ‘Although there are outliers, the majority of women lawyers are working for organisations that want to see them succeed and are bringing in measures to remove any barriers.

‘With organisations adopting a wide range of new initiatives, from gender blind work allocation to fertility services and menopause support, it’s time to take a step back and focus on what women are telling us really works. By thinking more strategically, law firms and other organisations can ensure efforts to improve diversity in their workforce are being channelled effectively.

‘Our research suggests that means prioritising practical help with childcare, more truly flexible working options, targeted support for returners and wider uptake of mentoring and coaching schemes or networks.

“A worrying element of the research is that despite the obvious benefits, many women feel that more flexible working patterns limit their opportunities and that as a result, they may be missing out on the “best” work. The profession must work harder when it comes to being transparent about work allocation, promotions and recruitment, making sure that there is a level playing field that doesn’t disadvantage those juggling caring commitments.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll