header-logo header-logo

Women lawyers give verdict on which workplace equality measures work best

14 July 2023
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity , Equality
printer mail-detail
Mentoring and coaching are effective, but external diversity pledges are less so when it comes to tearing down barriers to women’s progress at work, according to the latest research from the Next 100 Years project.

Women in the legal profession gave their verdict on a variety of gender equality initiatives for the research report, published this week. Notably, while 67% of women believe their workplace is committed to removing barriers to women’s progress, only 45% think current measures are working effectively. So, what works best?

Most legal sector workplaces now offer remote or hybrid working (88%) and part-time working (68%)—both measures considered to be very effective by the women surveyed. The research suggests more practical support and increased flexibility would see organisations make further strides.

The survey respondents also recommended mentoring and coaching—less than half workplaces undertake this but 79% of women considered it effective. Flexi-time (offered by less than a third of workplaces) also came highly recommended by 79% of women.

While only one in five workplaces offer additional support for maternity returners, 72% consider it an effective approach. Women’s networks (available at 39% of workplaces) were also popular, with 69% considering them effective.

A majority of respondents also recommended financial support for childcare (offered by 5% of workplaces), gender diverse client teams (implemented by 12%) and enhanced paternity leave (offered by 22%).

External diversity pledges were considered to be the least effective measure, with only 36% considering them to be effective and 27% considering them ineffective.

The respondents welcomed the post-pandemic move to more hybrid and part-time working, but expressed some fears about the impact such working patterns have on the allocation of work between men and women. One in five respondents believe work is unfairly allocated, and only 54% felt confident about fair allocation. More than half thought part-time working meant they were not given the best work. More than a third expressed the same fear about working from home.

Overall, four themes emerged from the report regarding what changes would make the most difference. These were the need for:

  • fair and transparent recruitment and promotion processes;
  • accountability, with leadership taking responsibility;
  • support for working parents; and
  • societal change relating to gender stereotypes about the roles of women and men.

Dana Denis-Smith, founder of the Next 100 Years and CEO of Obelisk Support, said: ‘Although there are outliers, the majority of women lawyers are working for organisations that want to see them succeed and are bringing in measures to remove any barriers.

‘With organisations adopting a wide range of new initiatives, from gender blind work allocation to fertility services and menopause support, it’s time to take a step back and focus on what women are telling us really works. By thinking more strategically, law firms and other organisations can ensure efforts to improve diversity in their workforce are being channelled effectively.

‘Our research suggests that means prioritising practical help with childcare, more truly flexible working options, targeted support for returners and wider uptake of mentoring and coaching schemes or networks.

“A worrying element of the research is that despite the obvious benefits, many women feel that more flexible working patterns limit their opportunities and that as a result, they may be missing out on the “best” work. The profession must work harder when it comes to being transparent about work allocation, promotions and recruitment, making sure that there is a level playing field that doesn’t disadvantage those juggling caring commitments.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll