header-logo header-logo

Words v intentions

04 August 2017 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

​Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason return with a wills & probate update

  • Application for revocation for a grant of letters of administration.
  • Whether wording in will is sufficient to exclude the operation of s 33 of the Wills Act 1837.

Donna-Lynne Maria Morris v Sylvester Hazelwood Browne, Carol Hazelwood-Morris and Mr Evans [2017] EWHC 631 (Ch) deals with an application for revocation for a grant of letters of administration and an account in light of the existence of a will.

Ethelyn Violet Morris died on 22 March 2012. She had five children, namely the Claimant, the three Defendants and a further son, Colin, who was not a party. The Defendants obtained letters of administration on their mother’s purported intestacy on 2 October 2013 and sold her property for £920,000 in February 2014.

The Claimant’s solicitors wrote to the Defendants in February 2015 saying they understood that the Defendants had been aware of the existence of the deceased’s will, enclosing a copy of the original. The solicitors made clear that under the will, the Claimant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll