header-logo header-logo

Write or wrong

09 January 2015 / Mark Lewis
Issue: 7635 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail
lewis

Mark Lewis advocates putting copyright licences in writing & setting out the terms in full

The recent case of Orvec International Limited v Linfoots Limited [2014] EWHC 1970 (IPEC), [2014] All ER (D) 160 (Jun) concerned the extent of rights granted by Linfoots to Orvec in respect of images on its website and in its advertising material. The case demonstrates the perils of not having a written copyright licence in place.

Background facts

Orvec sells textile products, such as blankets and pillows, to airlines for use by their passengers.

Orvec hired Linfoots, an advertising agency, to design and maintain its website and also to create advertising material for it. Linfoots made photographs of Orvec’s products (the Photographs) and these appeared on Orvec’s website and in its advertising material.

As the author of the Photographs, Linfoots was the first owner of copyright in the Photographs and it retained ownership of that copyright by virtue of an express term to that effect in its standard terms and conditions.

In 2011, the parties ended their business

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll