header-logo header-logo

29 January 2016 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The wrong side of the law

Alec Samuels reflects on the pros & cons of a touch of judicial illegality

The claimant has a good legal case, but the defendant points to a touch of illegality on the part of the claimant. Is this fatal to the claim? A claimant cannot be allowed to profit from illegality. The integrity of the legal system must be preserved. The court cannot condone illegality. Allowing one claimant to get away with illegality could encourage others to try to do the same.

However, there may be matters of public policy involving the public interest which will allow or justify the judge in nonetheless not acceding to the illegality defence. The illegality may be outweighed by the public policy.

Trespass

Long term trespass, unlawful illegal tortious trespass, can eventually give rise to acquired legal rights, such as easements, common land rights, even title by adverse possession. As a matter of public policy it is important that we should know our rights, and indeed the rights of others. Land and property should have a title

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll