header-logo header-logo

29 January 2016 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The wrong side of the law

Alec Samuels reflects on the pros & cons of a touch of judicial illegality

The claimant has a good legal case, but the defendant points to a touch of illegality on the part of the claimant. Is this fatal to the claim? A claimant cannot be allowed to profit from illegality. The integrity of the legal system must be preserved. The court cannot condone illegality. Allowing one claimant to get away with illegality could encourage others to try to do the same.

However, there may be matters of public policy involving the public interest which will allow or justify the judge in nonetheless not acceding to the illegality defence. The illegality may be outweighed by the public policy.

Trespass

Long term trespass, unlawful illegal tortious trespass, can eventually give rise to acquired legal rights, such as easements, common land rights, even title by adverse possession. As a matter of public policy it is important that we should know our rights, and indeed the rights of others. Land and property should have a title

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll