header-logo header-logo

29 January 2016 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The wrong side of the law

Alec Samuels reflects on the pros & cons of a touch of judicial illegality

The claimant has a good legal case, but the defendant points to a touch of illegality on the part of the claimant. Is this fatal to the claim? A claimant cannot be allowed to profit from illegality. The integrity of the legal system must be preserved. The court cannot condone illegality. Allowing one claimant to get away with illegality could encourage others to try to do the same.

However, there may be matters of public policy involving the public interest which will allow or justify the judge in nonetheless not acceding to the illegality defence. The illegality may be outweighed by the public policy.

Trespass

Long term trespass, unlawful illegal tortious trespass, can eventually give rise to acquired legal rights, such as easements, common land rights, even title by adverse possession. As a matter of public policy it is important that we should know our rights, and indeed the rights of others. Land and property should have a title

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll