header-logo header-logo

17 November 2011 / Stephan Balthasar
Issue: 7490 / Categories: Features , EU , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The wrong vehicle?

Is the common European sales law a Trojan horse, asks Stephan Balthasar

The European Commission has been pursuing efforts to harmonise European contract law for over a decade now. More recently, the project has been gaining speed: in 2010, the Commission published a green paper on policy options for “progress towards a European contract law for consumers and businesses” (COM(2010)348). Following the consultation process, the Commission nominated an expert group to work out a feasibility study, which was published on 3 May 2011. On 11 October, Viviane Reding, Vice-president and Commissioner responsible for justice, fundamental rights and citizenship, presented a proposal for a regulation “on a Common European Sales Law” (COM(2011)635), which she intends to put on the statute book by 2012.

The Commission’s draft regulation provides for an “optional instrument”, the so-called “28th regime”—a contract law that parties to cross-border sales contracts may choose as an alternative to national laws (Art 3 of the draft regulation). The common European sales law is designed to be applied in both B2B and B2C relationships. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll