header-logo header-logo

20 April 2007 / Philip Davis , Graham Ludlam
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Wynn or lose?

When should contracts be discharged? Philip Davis and Graham Ludlam investigate

For the past decade Le Rêve (The Dream) by Pablo Picasso has been hanging on the wall of the offices of Las Vegas casino magnate Steve Wynn. He bought the painting, which depicts Picasso’s mistress, for $48.4m in 1997. Wynn recently entered into a contract to sell the painting to hedge fund mogul and avid art collector Steven Cohen for $139m. However, before the contract could be performed, Wynn, who has little to no peripheral vision due to an eye condition, tore a coin-sized hole in the 75-year-old painting with his elbow while gesturing when explaining the painting’s history to friends.
 
The sale agreement was entered into the day before the accident, which Wynn says wiped $54m off the value of Le Rêve. The painting was professionally repaired, but Wynn claims the damage is still visible. The decrease in value has been the subject of an insurance claim which has generated its own litigation in the New York courts. Following the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll