header-logo header-logo

20 April 2007 / Philip Davis , Graham Ludlam
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Wynn or lose?

When should contracts be discharged? Philip Davis and Graham Ludlam investigate

For the past decade Le Rêve (The Dream) by Pablo Picasso has been hanging on the wall of the offices of Las Vegas casino magnate Steve Wynn. He bought the painting, which depicts Picasso’s mistress, for $48.4m in 1997. Wynn recently entered into a contract to sell the painting to hedge fund mogul and avid art collector Steven Cohen for $139m. However, before the contract could be performed, Wynn, who has little to no peripheral vision due to an eye condition, tore a coin-sized hole in the 75-year-old painting with his elbow while gesturing when explaining the painting’s history to friends.
 
The sale agreement was entered into the day before the accident, which Wynn says wiped $54m off the value of Le Rêve. The painting was professionally repaired, but Wynn claims the damage is still visible. The decrease in value has been the subject of an insurance claim which has generated its own litigation in the New York courts. Following the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll